Strengthening Pet Safety and Welfare: Why Local Animal Control Ordinances Matter

by Jon Scaccia September 9, 2024

When was the last time you thought about your local animal control laws? If you’re like most pet owners, it’s probably been a while. However, these laws, often hidden in the fine print of municipal codes, play a crucial role in the safety and welfare of both pets and humans alike. Whether it’s ensuring your pet’s wellbeing or protecting the public from harm, local ordinances can make a big difference. But are they doing enough?

In a study published by researchers Laura A. Reese and Kellee M. Remer, they dug into the details of animal control ordinances across Michigan, exploring whether they align with best practices recommended by veterinary and animal welfare organizations. Their findings raise questions about how cities handle pet-related issues and why improvements are necessary. In this blog, we’ll break down the key takeaways and what they mean for pet owners like you.

Why Animal Control Ordinances Matter

Local animal control ordinances serve as the rulebook for managing pets and other animals within a city. They typically cover a wide range of issues—from licensing requirements and vaccination rules to the handling of stray animals and dangerous dogs. These regulations are vital for public safety and animal welfare. After all, laws help to minimize risks like dog bites and public nuisances, while also ensuring that animals receive proper care and attention.

But according to Reese and Remer’s research, not all cities are doing enough. Their study revealed that most cities in Michigan focus heavily on control and public safety, often at the expense of animal welfare. As pet owners, this should give us pause. Laws that don’t fully address the welfare of animals may contribute to neglect and abuse, leaving our furry friends vulnerable.

The Study’s Findings: Gaps in Best Practices

The research compared local animal control ordinances to best practices outlined by reputable animal welfare organizations like the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and the National Animal Interest Alliance (NAIA). Shockingly, many cities fell short.

For example, while 81% of the cities required dog licenses, only 7% mandated spaying or neutering for stray animals—a practice that can significantly reduce the overpopulation problem. And while the majority of cities had rules about dangerous dogs, only a small fraction had detailed provisions about animal cruelty, such as banning tethering or requiring proper shelter for outdoor pets. These gaps could lead to unnecessary suffering for animals, and they also expose the community to potential risks.

Why does this happen? It seems that cities, often dealing with limited resources and pressing public safety concerns, prioritize controlling animals rather than ensuring their welfare. In simpler terms, the goal is often to manage potential nuisances rather than protect pets.

Real-World Implications for Pet Owners

So what does this mean for you as a pet owner? First, it’s a reminder that animal welfare isn’t just about the love and care you give your own pet—it’s also about ensuring the community has laws in place that protect all animals. The research suggests that many cities still treat pets like problems to be managed, rather than beings that deserve humane treatment and care.

Consider the issue of tethering. In some cities, it’s still legal to leave a dog tied up outside for hours, even though research has shown that tethering can lead to behavioral issues, including aggression. Without strong local laws, animals left in these conditions may suffer, while their frustrated owners may be unaware of better alternatives.

Or think about stray animals. Without spay and neuter requirements, animal shelters face overwhelming numbers of strays, leading to overcrowding and, in some cases, euthanasia. Best practice laws could alleviate this by ensuring that strays are neutered before adoption, reducing the chances of more animals ending up in shelters.

A Glimmer of Hope: Positive Examples

While the findings may sound discouraging, it’s not all bad news. Some Michigan cities have taken steps to improve their ordinances, setting a positive example for others to follow. For instance, cities in the Detroit metropolitan area were more likely to have comprehensive ordinances that include anti-tethering provisions and humane education programs. These cities recognize that improving animal welfare isn’t just about reducing complaints—it’s about creating a safer, more compassionate community for everyone.

These forward-thinking ordinances offer hope for pet owners across the country. With the right policies in place, we can ensure that animals are treated with dignity and respect, and that communities are better equipped to handle pet-related challenges.

What Can You Do?

You might be wondering, “What can I do as a pet owner?” The good news is that there are plenty of ways to get involved in shaping your community’s animal control policies.

1. Educate Yourself and Others: First, familiarize yourself with your city’s animal control ordinances. Are they up to par with best practices? If not, start a conversation with fellow pet owners and community members about why change is necessary.
2. Advocate for Stronger Laws: Don’t be afraid to reach out to your local government officials. City councils and animal control officers often rely on citizen input when making policy decisions. By advocating for humane treatment of animals, you can help drive positive change.
3. Support Animal Welfare Organizations: Groups like the AVMA and NAIA provide valuable resources and guidance on model ordinances. Supporting these organizations or even partnering with them can give you the tools you need to make a difference in your community.

Join the Conversation

How do you think your city’s animal control ordinances stack up? Have you experienced any issues related to pet welfare or public safety that could have been improved with better local laws? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments or on social media! Your voice could inspire others to take action.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

Reese and Remer’s study highlights a critical issue that often flies under the radar: the need for better animal control ordinances. By focusing on both public safety and animal welfare, cities can create environments where pets and people coexist more harmoniously. But it won’t happen overnight. It’s up to all of us—pet owners, advocates, and community members—to push for the changes that will protect our pets and make our cities safer.

So the next time you’re out walking your dog or visiting the local park, remember: The laws that protect your pet could be better. And with your help, they just might be.